site stats

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

WebAug 13, 1993 · PALEA alleged that copies of the Code had been circulated in limited numbers; that being penal in nature the Code must conform with the requirements of sufficient publication, and that the Code was arbitrary, oppressive, and prejudicial to the rights of the employees. http://source.gosupra.com/docs/decision/36543

PHILIPPINE AIRLINES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS …

WebPALEA vs PAL Inc (70 SCRA 244. 1976) 93. Odango vs NLRC (GR no. 147420. Jun 10 2004) 94. National Development Co vs CIR National Textile Workers Union (GR no. L-15422. ... Philippine Airlines vs National Labor Relations Commission (GR no. 55159. Jun 22 1989) 9. SSS vs SSS Supervisors’ Union-CUGCO (GR no. L-31832. WebApr 3, 2024 · 7/28/2024 PAL v. PALEA. 1/3. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(PALEA), respondent. Facts: On 6 … microsoft search in teams https://theresalesolution.com

G.R. No.L-31341 - Lawphil

WebJul 8, 2024 · Philippine Airlines, Inc. [PAL] Vs. Philippine Airlines Employees Association [PALEAJ], Eugene Soriano, et al./Renato Ebio, et al. Vs. PALEA and Eugene Soriano/PALEA and Eugene Soriano Vs. Renato Ebio, et al. G.R. No. 243460/G.R. No. 243486/G.R. No. 243528. July 8, 2024 WebJul 23, 2008 · WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Office renders judgment declaring that Philippine Airlines, Inc., illegally retrenched One Thousand Four Hundred (1,400) … WebSep 27, 2010 · The Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA), represented by its hold-over president Alexander O. Barrientos, appeals the decision rendered on … how to create good website

PAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA 301.docx - PAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA …

Category:Philippines Airlines (PAL) to destroy 2,700 jobs in March

Tags:Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

PAL v. NLRC PDF - Scribd

WebPALEA alleged that copies of the Code had been circulated in limited numbers; that being penal in nature the Code must conform with the requirements of sufficient publication, and that the Code was arbitrary, oppressive, and prejudicial to the rights of the employees. WebPALEA, as the winner in that election, was certified by the BLR as the exclusive bargaining agent of all the rank-and-file employee of the Philippine Airlines, Inc. PALEA and PAL signed a 3-year collective bargaining agreement effective October 1, …

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Did you know?

WebSep 3, 2011 · Converted to Philippine Pesos, PAL’s income for the previous year amounted to MORE THAN PhP 3 BILLION (computed at $1: PhP 42.50). Despite these, PAL will … WebPAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA 301 (1993) FACTS: On March 15, 1985, the Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) completely revised its 1966 Code of Discipline. The Code was circulated …

WebFirst Philippine International Bank, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., 252 SCRA 259 (1996). Five-Star Bus Company, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 313 SCRA 367 (1999). Lo Sui v. WebOn February 14, 1963, the Philippine Air Lines Employees' Association (PALEA) and the Philippine Air Lines Supervisors' Association (PALSA) — petitioners in G.R. No. L …

WebNov 17, 2013 · PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., respondents. FACTS: THIS case portrays the peculiar story of an international flight steward who was dismissed because of his failure to adhere to the weight standards of the airline company. Web1. declaring the defendant, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. otherwise known as ‘PAL’ as a government-controlled corporation and, therefore, falling within the purview of Republic …

WebGPA Law Office and Associates

WebThe Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) filed a complaint before t he National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). PALEA contended that PAL, by its unilateral implementation of the Code, was guilty of unfair labor practice, spec ifically Paragraphs E and G of Article 249 and Article 253 of the Labor Code. microsoft search not working windows 10WebJan 20, 2009 · This Court has repeatedly held that execution is the final stage of litigation, 20 the fruit and end of the suit. 21 Thus, the proceedings before the RTC were not terminated by the filing of the appeal to the CA. The same could not be executed - hence, not yet terminated - until the appeal is decided with finality. microsoft search lighthouse programWebOn January 4, 1956, plaintiff Philippine Airlines Employees' Association — otherwise known as the PALEA — whose members are regular employees of defendant … microsoft search is not working