Nettet30. sep. 2009 · Both were CTS pots bought under the AllParts logo from GC. Neither is marked A or B, A being audio/log B being linear. WTF? Edit: The answer from Kinman: Also be aware that 1Meg ohm pots (and to a lesser degree 500K) have an unpleasant ramp-up characteristic that a lot of high-gain players won't like. Nettet12. feb. 2024 · I'm experimenting with my (PGK) SG Junior. Originally, the pots are a 500k audio taper Volume pot and a 250k audio taper Tone pot feeding a P90. I'm trying a …
Linear vs. Audio Taper Pots; Is my memory failing?
Nettet23. jan. 2012 · Tone pots should always be log/audio taper. I use linear taper vol pots because I want a fine control going down from 10. I nearly always have the vol rolled … Nettet19. mar. 2024 · Here is a comparison of linear pot with low input impedance and log pot loaded with high input impedance. Almost the same! When the guitar is professional, … q investmentsrenegade swish
POTS ???? AUDIO or LINEAR TAPER - The Les Paul Forum
Nettet15. mai 2024 · It causes your signal to clip. A LINEAR taper pot increases the signal in a linear fashion. (“1” on your control is equal to 10%, “4” is equal to 40% and so forth) This works very different from an audio … Nettet23. nov. 2011 · But I got fed up (with standard Fender audio pots) with turning my volume control down to 8 & finding that I lost half my volume. Now, with a linear volume pot, I need to turn down to 5 or 6 to reduce the noise my guitar makes by an equivalent amount. So I have more subtlety & control with my linear pot. If you try both, let us know how … Nettet19. feb. 2006 · The linear give you more abrupt changes from 0-3 and smoother from 5 - 10. Apparently, Gibson feels the current linear pots are a better match; others feel the log pots are better. I prefer the log pots on a tone control, but can go either way for the volume. That said, I swapped the pots in my 05 R8 for CTS audio pots. q investments interview