WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S M Anand on 23 August, 2024. Author: S.Sujatha And N.K.Sudhindrarao. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI … Web% - 0 0 0 ) - % +% ! + = >> : 0 % ! 0 ! ... 9 ! + % 0 % ( ( )2 0 + ( 0 )- 0 %- % 0

Presumptive Taxation: Assessee not under obligation to explain …

WebThe CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of initial payment of installment of vend allotted, initial investment in the infrastructure in purchase of … WebPunjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself. The provisions of presumptive taxation are enacted to facilitate computation of total income and filing of return of income. popclaw landlord death

Income Tax on presumptive basis Section 44AD of The Income Tax …

WebThe Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows'.- 8 I.T.A. No. 451/Coch/2024 "7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. WebSurinder Pal Anand, 242 CTR 61(P&H). 6. Ld D.R. on the other hand, relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. of lower authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit of ₹20,67,668/- … Web(hereinafter referred as Ld. Pr. CIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (herein after refered as the Act). 2. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed return of income of Rs. 1,44,320/- by computing income u/s 44AD of the Act. The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny and the ld AO made an addition of Rs. popclaw and the landlord